![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Vol.
7, No. 7, Sept 2008|
To The Editor
| Subscribe | Back
Issues |
MeasuresOfSuccess.com | Masthead |
Advisory Board | Reprint
Information | |
||
To return to the current issue's contents page, click here. To return to the contents page of the issue that this article appeared in, click here. Comments
Please! |
Letter from Warsaw, Part 2
Trend
#1: Apparently an elderly lady made her annual visit from the countryside into London to buy gloves. She always went to John Lewis because it had the largest selection. Instead of finding her usual choice of 50 styles of gloves, she found only a handful of choices. Infuriated, she went home and wrote a blog posting about it, and within days she'd attracted 100 other similarly glove-hungry and outraged ladies into the conversation. Those 100 agreed to meet and march on John Lewis to protest what they saw was an arbitrary disregard of customer wishes. Of course, the last thing a bastion of British shopping wants is pictures of hundreds of ladies with picket signs outside the shop windows. Needless to say, John Lewis' head of communications now places a much higher priority on listening to what is being said about her brand in social media. Proving that even the most conservative environment will change. Trend
#2: Trend
#3: Trend
#4: Trend
#5: Trend
#6: But he has a point. He compared PR measurement to the old story of the doctor talking to a woman whose husband he had recently operated on: "The operation was brilliant but the patient has died." Farrington and I share the view that far too often in PR measurement the wrong objective has been set, or the metrics don't line up with the objectives. He cited the example of an award program he judged in which most of the prizes were going to go to a food chain for brilliant work which had been properly planned and evaluated. They used every gimmick you can think of to effectively get the message across, but, as he tells it, "The evening before we were to present the award, the company went bankrupt." It seems that the food chain, known for selling to working class people, had made their food too expensive. While they were way ahead of the game in terms of going organic, the fundamental measures of success were wrong. Yes, they got headlines, and messages out there, but consumers weren't prepared to pay more for their product, so ultimately they lost market share and collapsed. (Editor's Note: Wait a minute, that argument has faulty logic: You can't claim that bad business strategy proves PR measurement is useless. The measurement was not the cause of the problem. Still, it's an interesting story.) Trend
#7:
Trend
#8: For more
on the 4th Warsaw Congress on Public Relations, read Part 3 of this
report, on
Phillip Dewhurst's view of the new European public relations environment. Or
read Katie
Delahaye Paine's Measurement Blog post, complete with many photos. |
|
||
|
|
Three Reasons Why You Should Subscribe to The Measurement Standard: 1. Youll learn how to use hard numbers to prove the results of your PR efforts. (Plus, it's free.) 2. Youll learn which are the right vendors for your measurement projects. (Yes, it's free.) 3. Youll learn how to design your program right from the start to be easily measureable. (Plus, yes, it's free.) |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
177 Main Street, Berlin, NH 03570 |
|||