![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Vol.
7, No. 7, Sept 2008|
To The Editor
| Subscribe | Back
Issues |
MeasuresOfSuccess.com | Masthead |
Advisory Board | Reprint
Information | |
||
To return to the current issue's contents page, click here. To return to the contents page of the issue that this article appeared in, click here. Comments
Please! |
The Measurement Maven and Menace of the Month Awards The Measurement Mavens of the Month: While I don't agree with everything that researchers in the UK subscribe to, I have to admit that I am more and more impressed by the thought that goes into measurement in the UK. From Metrica's Consumer Pulse study (see here, too) and Measurement Matters blog, to the rigorous methodology that they use to determine public opinion, you can't help but be impressed by these guys. When I asked Philip Dewhurst from Gazprom if he was tying his PR results to outcomes, he could immediately cite evidence from his German counterparts. And even though I may disagree with their content analysis methodology, I have to admit that Report International has certainly put more thought into it than most of my American colleagues. So pip pip and all that: Let's raise a pint to our cousins across the pond for doing some jolly good work. --KDP
The Measurement Menaces of the Month: The
Pollsters and Media Outlets That Knowingly
Produce Faulty Polls If one accepts the premise that polling is a necessary requirement of democracy, then it is imperative that polls accurately reflect the opinion of the people. In England this is such a fundamental foundation of democracy that all polling is done door-to-door. Sadly, in America we have sacrificed accuracy for the speed of phone and Internet polls. We increasingly find the results seriously flawed, as David Moore has shown so well in The Opinion Makers. (Read our review of this excellent and recommended book here.) But it's not just the pollsters that are to blame, it's also the media who pay for the polls. The media's job is to sell space, airtime and newspapers. And admitting that polls include the 80% of Americans who haven't yet made up their minds doesn't sell more of anything. So polls persist in asking the wrong questions, biasing results, and misleading both the public and politicians. What good is a vote if it's based on flawed data? If ever
there was the epitome of a Measurement Menace,
this
is it. It's time that Americans either fix the system or
come up with a new one. Clearly, relying on flawed polls conducted
by biased media
is not the way to run a democracy. --KDP |
|
||
|
|
Three Reasons Why You Should Subscribe to The Measurement Standard: 1. Youll learn how to use hard numbers to prove the results of your PR efforts. (Plus, it's free.) 2. Youll learn which are the right vendors for your measurement projects. (Yes, it's free.) 3. Youll learn how to design your program right from the start to be easily measureable. (Plus, yes, it's free.) |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
177 Main Street, Berlin, NH 03570 |
|||