 |
 |
 |
 |
| Vol.
8, No. 6, Aug 2009 |
To The Editor
| Subscribe | Back
Issues |
KDPaine.com | Masthead |
KDPaine's Blog | Reprint
Information | Search |
|||
The
Dark Side of PR
by Katie Delahaye Paine Every night for a week, I've watched MSNBC's Rachel Maddow expose yet another astroturfing or "spin-a-palooza" incident:
At the end of each segment Maddow points out that while there's nothing illegal about any of these activities, they are nothing more than corporate-funded PR and should be labeled as such. She's right. These phony protests are PR -- reprehensible PR. Fortunately, in this day and age, it is very easy to identify and expose the people and the motives behind any such "campaigns." All it takes is a click or two to figure out where the money is coming from and who is pulling the strings. Maddow even shows you how and where to get the facts. Once the true nature of these events is exposed, any thinking person will immediately become skeptical, question the motives, and lose confidence in the effort. And lose confidence in public relations in general. At the end of the day we have to ask ourselves: If this is what our profession is becoming known for, then why would anyone believe the rest of us? These manipulated campaigns are making it harder and harder for normal everyday -- principled, that is -- PR professionals to do their jobs. If the essential image of PR is that we're the people behind astroturfing and fake rallies and counterfeit letter writing campaigns, anything we do will be looked at with suspicion. Worse still, any young person with morals, ethics, or integrity will no doubt chose a different career. Where ever there is a 24-hour cable station hungry for content, corporate-sponsored protests will make news. The real problem is that, as long as success is measured in how many eyeballs are reached by the effort, the PR firms behind the pretend protests will earn their fees and put the campaign in their brag books. Whether or not the companies ultimately achieve their business objectives -- and are helped or hurt by the inevitable backlash -- is a vital but seldom-considered measure of success. Chances are good that the firms are using good old AVEs to prove to the clients that they have achieved enormous success. Fortunately there is a new breed of PR people emerging from the ranks. People like Brian Solis, who has co-written Putting the Public Back in Public Relations, the guidebook for how to do PR right in an age of spin (read the book review also in this month's issue). And like Kathleen Buczko of NMC Partners, who, for as long as I've known her, has told prospective clients to take a hike if they don't have a product or service worthy of attention. And a host of other people, wise in the ways of social media, who understand that being real and transparent is the best road to trust and commitment. So, to
all you idealists out there who think that PR has to do with building
relationships and solving problems: Hang in there. Read
Solis and Breakenridge's book,
and believe that your time is coming. Learn how to measure real impact and
outcomes, and wait for those eyeball-counting, AVE-advocating
media manipulators to
go out with the buggy whip, the rotary phone, the phony protest, and the other
failed symbols of the 20th Century. |
 |
Recent new articles:
Here is the book that gets people hired!
|
|
|
177 Main Street, Berlin, NH 03570 |
|||
