To
return to the current issue's contents page, click
here.
To
return to the contents page of the issue that this article appeared
in, click here.
Comments
Please!
Send
us your thoughts on this article and we will post them in our Comments
section. |
|
The
Measurement Industry
Big
Changes in Four Years
A measurement retrospective:
More speed, more pressure, more accountability,
more media and more business.
by
Katie Delahaye Paine
It
must be the old newspaper gal in me that just loves an anniversary.
Nothing provides a better excuse for a retrospective, be it six months
after a hurricane, ten years after an earthquake or, in our case, four
years after the launching of KDPaine & Partners. The measurement
industry has come a long way since then; I'll bet most of you are using
different technology and working for a different company than you were
four years ago. Here are the most important recent changes I've noticed
in our industry.
Accountability and measurement: An extreme makeover
Measurement is in the middle of its makeover from geek to pretty darn
cool. In this post-Enron, SOX era of accountability, the boards are
pressuring clients, clients are pressuring agencies and all in all,
measurement is just about as cool a concept as Truthiness. And, in fact,
measurement is a big part of Truthiness and transparency. As more and
more companies come under investigation for their accounting practices
-- or worse, their PR practices (Department of Defense, are you listening?)
-- the greater the demand for accountability. And the greater the demand
for measurement.
Response time has gone from "next day" to "next instant"
The media are faster and the messages more frequent. In my old company
four years ago, our snail-mail newsletter went out once a quarter and
everyone seemed reasonably happy with its medium and timeliness. With
KDPaine & Partners, we went to monthly on the Web with The Measurement
Standard, and that too seemed suitable in frequency and format.
Today the medium of choice is the blog (see my PR measurement blog at
kdpaine.blogs.com)
and the industry is hungry for daily updates. The measurement business,
like most, is in transition between the traditional one-way form of
communications and a new structure where dialog and conversation rules.
On the one hand, it's the march of progress. On the other hand, is there
really that much happening in the world of PR measurement?
Data digest, not data overload
Too much data, as anyone who studies their Web server logs knows, is
not always a good thing. Obviously, quarterly reports aren't current
enough for many organizations anymore. But just because people want
the latest information at their fingertips doesn't mean they want to
respond to data daily. Sometimes it seems that PR professionals are
afflicted with a greater level of information overload than space shuttle
pilots.
The past
four years have seen reports shrink from ten pages to three, and updates
become available 24.7.365. It used to be that we would determine
when the information was available, now the client decides
when he or she wants to access it, and does so via a secure online Website.
Technology makes things a heck of a lot more efficient
Along with this demand for faster access to data has come enormous improvements
in productivity. Thanks largely to more efficient software, people who
once only dreamed of having data at their finger tips now make data-driven
decisions every day.
Cymfony
and Biz360 have automated the content analysis business to such an extent
that many programs are now being measured that would have been considered
"unmeasurable" for budget reasons ten years ago. And here
at KDPaine & Partners, Olivier Gaudissart has created software that
shaves hours off just about every phase of the measurement process.
I'm pleased to say that our revenue per employee is more than double
what it was at my old business four years ago. And I'm sure we're not
alone in that leap in productivity.
The playing field keeps expanding
In the early days of measurement, we pretty much measured print media:
trades, daily newspapers and magazines. Occasionally we'd get a request
for broadcast. Boy, how things have changed. There isn't a client anywhere
who hasn't at inquired about monitoring blogs and/or consumer generated
media. (And we can't wait for them to start asking about wikis,
podcasts and whatever else comes up next.) If a measurement firm is
going to be around a decade from now, the size and variety of measurement
tools will need to expand as quickly, if not faster, than the media
we're measuring.
PR -- and measurement -- now plays much better with others
Increasingly, organizations are measuring PR results alongside direct
mail or advertising or community relations or employee relations. This
trend towards consistency is a great thing, and it's a reflection of
a trend we spotted several years ago: Good PR people use measurement
to be successful, move up the organizational hierarchy, assume more
responsibility for more different types of communications, and take
their measurement mindset with them.
Despite the speed of change, a surprising number of things have stayed
the same.
- The
world is still made up of Martians and Venutians. Martians
still think in terms of numbers and charts and graphs. The fastest
way to send Venutians running for their space ships is to show them
an algorithm. On the other hand, Venutians can chase away the bravest
Martian by using too many words in a row when reporting results.
- There
are still Mavens and Menaces. Despite our best efforts to
turn everyone into a Maven, and to eliminate most Menaces, we still
see far too great a split between the measurement wonks that really
truly believe in this stuff, and the Menaces that continue to search
for a magic bullet or an "AVE" number that makes them feel
good but is ultimately meaningless.
- International
measurement is still the measurement equivalent of a third world country.
Whether it's the cost, the complexity or the differences in culture
and mentality, international measurement just hasn't progressed to
the extent that domestic measurement has. Too few companies are looking
beyond their borders to see what the rest of the world is thinking
or saying about them. The reality is that, as in so many other areas,
US communicators have their head in the sand way deeper than their
counterparts in other countries. Communicators in England, France,
Scandinavia, India, China, New Zealand, Australia, Turkey and even
Iran are looking seriously into establishing measurement programs,
and many are focused on better understanding the perceptions that
Americans have of their countries. If only we here in the US were
so enlightened.
- Finally,
the rules of measurement still apply, despite the radical changes
in how we communicate:
- Measurement
is still a comparative process; you need to know what you're going
to benchmark yourself against.
- How
you measure is still entirely dependent on what your objectives
are.
- What
you measure is still dependent on who your target audiences are.
- Why
you measure should still be because you want to improve your results
and make better data-driven decisions.
|
|
|