![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Vol.
6, No. 11, March 2008|
To The Editor
| Subscribe | Back
Issues |
MeasuresOfSuccess.com | Masthead |
Advisory Board | Reprint
Information | |
||
To return to the current issue's contents page, click here. To return to the contents page of the issue that this article appeared in, click here. Comments
Please! |
The
Measurement Maven and Menace The Measurement Maven of the Month: John
List When three or more people forward you the same article saying, "You have to read this!" -- it makes you pay attention. That's what happened with the New York Times Magazine piece about John List and his research on why people give to philanthropic organizations. And, since KDPaine & Partners is doing quite a lot of work in that area, we were thrilled with his main premise: Non-profits need to be making decisions based on data, not on long-standing beliefs that may or may not still hold water. Professor List brought together results from several research projects to demonstrate some interesting, if unexpected conclusions. One of which was that, for stimulating donations in fundraising campaigns, challenge grant seed money works better than matching grants. Of course we'd like to factor in some PR metrics into his research to figure out what impact headlines have on charitable giving. We know PR works with the ASPCA (see this article from last fall) but we'd love to see it factored into a broader range of philanthropic efforts. Nonetheless, he's this month's Measurement Maven for the rigorous approach he brings to the subject. --KDP The Measurement Menace of the Month:
Microsoft's
(Okay, I'm hopelessly prejudiced. I just got my new beautiful HP laptop pre-loaded with Vista and I hate it. It crashes about five times an hour, and my experience so far with Vista guarantees that my next laptop will be a Mac.) That having
been said, we are also naming Microsoft our Measurement Menace of
the Month for
their "Engagement
Mapping" product. Not that we don't believe in measuring
engagement, (we really like that whole concept, see this
recent article), but for throwing
its weight into the whole discussion without providing
any
transparency
or information as to how they "map engagement," or any
details at all as to what is behind this black box. --KDP |
|
||
|
|
Three Reasons Why You Should Subscribe to The Measurement Standard: 1. Youll learn how to use hard numbers to prove the results of your PR efforts. (Plus, it's free.) 2. Youll learn which are the right vendors for your measurement projects. (Yes, it's free.) 3. Youll learn how to design your program right from the start to be easily measureable. (Plus, yes, it's free.) |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
177 Main Street, Berlin, NH 03570 |
|||