![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Vol.
5, No. 9, February 8, 2006|
To The Editor
| Subscribe | Back
Issues |
MeasuresOfSuccess.com | Masthead |
Advisory Board | Reprint
Information | |
||
To return to the current issue's contents page, click here. To return to the contents page of the issue that this article appeared in, click here. Comments
Please! |
PR
Agency Reputation
by Katie Delahaye Paine Here's the latest update from KDPaine & Partners' on-going analysis of the blogosphere reputations of the top ten public relations firms. See below to link to a dashboard for each agency and summary charts for all agencies combined. Plus you can create new charts and view the data that goes into them. Background KDPaine & Partners has been analyzing the reputations of the top ten PR firms in the blogosphere since the beginning of June. (See our previous installment in this series here.) All postings (in both the blog body and comments) that mention one or more of these firms are collected. Each one is categorized by topic and rated on tonality -- as positive (i.e. it leaves the reader more likely to hire or go to work for the firm), negative (leaves the reader less likely to hire or go to work for the firm) or balanced. Recent Coverage Summary: The intensity of recent negative coverage (Edelman's blunders with Microsoft and Wal-Mart) has eased somewhat, but there is considerably more hostility towards PR firms now than there was back in the summer. Overall Edelman continues to dominate the discussion, but the following chart illustrates the importance of analyzing accurately for tonality. At first glance, the marketing or PR person at Edelman might be congratulated for dominating the discussion all fall. And clearly Edelman is on the rise, at the expense of Ketchum, Fleishman, Burson and H&K. Only Weber Shandwick saw any sort of significant gain in the last seven months: Share of Blog Body Coverage Over Time However, if we isolate the negative coverage, we see that very little of this discussion would leave a client more likely to do business with Edelman. The following chart shows each agency's share of negative coverage by week. The red is Edelman. Negative Blog
Body Coverage Over Time The good news for Burson and H&K is that Edelman's blunders seem to have taken the focus away from their issues. On the positive side, there's not nearly as much volume. However Ogilvy's Dove campaign and the bloggers who felt that it was okay for Edelman to send out PCs dominated the discussion. There was also a fair amount of positive discussion generated by various high profile searches for new agencies of record, including Wal-Mart, Sony and Microsoft. Positive
Blog Body Coverage Over Time Of greater concern to the industry should be the growth in the discussion of ethics, mostly negative, relative to the industry as a whole. As the following chart indicates, while bloggers questioned the business practices of agencies all along, only in the last three months have the ethics of the industry been a major part of the discussion. Unfavorable
Discussion by Issues Over
Time To determine which blogs are most influential to the industry, we calculated their conversation index – the ratio of comments to posts. Here are the results: Conversation
Index Agency Blog Interactive Dashboard To see the data discussed above in interactive dashboards for each agency, use this link to go to www.diydashboard.com. Follow these instructions:
|
|
||
|
|
Three Reasons Why You Should Subscribe to The Measurement Standard: 1. Youll learn how to use hard numbers to prove the results of your PR efforts. (Plus, it's free.) 2. Youll learn which are the right vendors for your measurement projects. (Yes, it's free.) 3. Youll learn how to design your program right from the start to be easily measureable. (Plus, yes, it's free.) |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
51c Durham Point Road, Durham, NH 03824 |
|||